1. Develop strategies
for funding.
2. Develop strategies
for management plans.
3. Describe the
required procedures for the proposed strategies.
The development of the
strategies and procedures for a technology plan seem to correspond to steps 6
& 7 of the Dick & Carey (2009) model of instructional design where instructional
strategy gets decided and the instructional materials are developed. In the case of designing a technology plan,
the strategies describe the logical clustering of steps from the Objectives in
order to answer the “Whys” and the” Whats” of the plan. The Whys correspond to providing the
motivating factors for an instructional strategy. The Whats correspond to the instructional
materials package- those items necessary to execute the strategy. Procedures for the plan are the details of How
to execute the strategies and may correspond closely to the steps.
The management objectives
of the technology plan for the John Cooper School are:
Goal 1: The school’s leaders will define and communicate expectations and
objectives for the faculty’s incorporation of technology in their instruction
to evolve teaching and learning.
Management objective 1.1:
Adopt and initiate a plan for The John Cooper School to
demonstrably transform the school to a digital-age model of teaching and
learning where teachers embrace technologies that promote:
·
Project-based, student-centered learning;
·
The acquisition of problem-solving skills; and
·
The development of media and information literacy
(NAIS, 2012).
Goal 2: The school’s leaders will commit to the faculty’s professional
development in instructional technology skills and strategies.
Management objective 2.1:
Designate a Teaching and Learning facilitator to work
with the pilot group faculty to:
·
Provide as-needed training and mentoring in technology
tools and instructional strategies;
·
Foster collaboration among the pilot faculty;
·
Identify available external resources (software,
activities, digital media, and training) for pilot group use;
·
Collect program metrics and document lessons learned
during the pilot.
Management objective 2.2:
Utilize lessons learned from the pilot program to grow
the evolution of digital-age teaching and learning both vertically and horizontally
from the pilot group through targeted professional development activities.
The funding objectives
of the plan are:
Funding objective 2.4:
Include a funding provision in the 2012-2013 budget
for the Teaching and Learning facilitator (either half- or full-time) and a
suitable budget for acquiring external professional development resources.
Funding objective 3.2:
The Technology department with concurrence from the
school Principals will adjust the acquisition and replacement of all school
computers so as to allow for the purchase of a sufficient number of mobile
computing devices to support the objectives of the pilot program.
Based upon the above summary, this week’s discussion
responses are:
Management strategies:
1.
Persuade
school administrators to commit to a transition to technology infused methods
of Teaching and Learning.
2.
Initiate
such a transition with a pilot program in Fall 2012 for a select set of
teachers in specific grades.
3.
Evolve
the transition from the pilot to additional teachers and grades over subsequent
years.
Together,
these strategies form a “wedge” approach where the transition is initiated as a
small effort that has a high probability of success without causing a large disruption
in current staffing or funding.
Procedures for these management strategies:
1.
Make
administrators and faculty aware of developments in other schools
a.
Attend
conferences on 21st century learning (done)
b.
Observe
classes where transition has successfully been implemented (done)
c.
Review
NAIS Principles of Good Practice for Technology Use and Teaching and Learning
2.
Have
the administrators describe the vision of a transformed classroom
3. Prepare
to initiate the change
d.
Obtain
approval for a pilot program for Fall 2012
e.
Select
the group of teachers and grades for the pilot and require that they
demonstrate through a class-based project an improved familiarity and comfort
with instructional technology tools and learner-centered instructional
techniques
f.
Prepare
a rubric to evaluate the demonstration projects
g.
Approve
and staff a Teaching and Learning Facilitator position (at least half-time) who
will work with the pilot group teachers and students
4.
Initiate
the pilot program in Fall 2012 semester
a)
Form
a “Digital-Age Instruction Steering Committee to meet monthly and review plans,
assess progress, and discuss issues with the plan to evolve Teaching and
Learning methods.
b)
Have
the Facilitator provide as-needed training and mentoring to the pilot group
c)
Foster
collaboration among the pilot faculty
d)
Identify
available external resources for pilot group use
e)
Collect
program metrics and document lessons learned during the pilot
5.
Evolve
the transition to include more teachers and grade levels
a)
Evaluate
the in-class demonstration projects and revise plans for the evolution
b)
Publicize
the accomplishments
c)
Develop
plans and requirements for expanding the program vertically (to cover current pilot
students as they promote up), and horizontally (to cover more teachers and
students at the current pilot grade levels)
d)
Seek
approval to make the Teaching and Learning Facilitator a full-time position
6.
Continue
to expand the “wedge” vertically (up and down in the grade levels) horizontally
within the grade levels
Funding strategies:
The
funding strategies follow along with the “wedge” approach for the management
strategies.
1.
Provision
a pilot program in Fall 2012 with iPads for a select set of teachers in
specific grades with a reallocation of existing funds and staffing.
2.
Seek
additional hardware funding (through donations or tuition increases) in order
to evolve the transition from the pilot to additional teachers and grades over
subsequent years.
3.
Consider
participating in the formation of a Local Educational Foundation (Technology
Grant & Resource News, 2012)which could provide additional funding for
technology hardware.
Procedures for these funding strategies:
1.
Provision
a pilot program for Fall 2012
a.
Include
a budget provision 2012-2013 school year for at least a half-time Teaching and
Learning Facilitator (could be shared with half-time teaching assignment)
b.
Include
a budget provision in 2012-2013 school year for acquiring external professional
development resources for the pilot program
c.
Technology
department will reallocate hardware replacement purchases to allow for provisioning the pilot
program
2.
Seek
additional funding in subsequent years to expand the “wedge” vertically and
horizontally
a.
Have
the Technology department continue to reallocate funds from purchasing shared
laptops/desktops to personalized internet appliances
b.
Recycle
“old” iPads down to younger grades as newer devices are added to the wedge
c.
Seek
one-time donations to offset the incremental cost of expanding number of computing
devices to students
d.
Seek
an acceptable on-going increase in the tuition rate or fees to cover the on-going
cost of providing a 1-to-1 computing device to student ratio.
Dick, W., Carey, L. and Carey, J. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th edition). Merrill: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Wright, E. (2012). Securing
technology funding: The expanding role of local education foundations (LEFs). Technology
Grant & Resource News. Retrieved March 17, 2012 from http://technologygrantnews.com/grant-index-by-type/educational-technology-grants.html
Digital-Age Instruction Steering Committee is an excellent solution to meeting the needs of students and teachers by staying abreast to the latest technology. Implementing the digital art of instruction is crucial to expanding the growth of the youth under our supervision/guidance. "The world of education is still in transition; the move to an all-digital environment will not be completed for some time to come. The cost of creating high-end multimedia content, although coming down, is still prohibitive for all but the very edge of the marketplace" (Thierstein,2009).
ReplyDeleteThierstein, J. (2009) Education in the Digital Age. Educause 44, (1). Retrieved (2012, March 19) from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume44/EducationintheDigitalAge/163578
Mike,
DeleteI relate to this: "Together, these strategies form a “wedge” approach where the transition is initiated as a small effort that has a high probability of success without causing a large disruption in current staffing or funding." An Instructional Technologist (self-taught) said that the best approach for her was to incorporate just one element of technology more in each lesson than she used the last time she taught it. She said, "It kind of sneaks up on you and then one day you are running a nearly paperless classroom where kids and teachers are learning together." *sigh*
Allison, you expressed the same "wedge" concept in your post- Start small, build on past successes and celebrate each step. Exactly the approach I am advocating.
DeleteLori, Thaks.
DeleteThe digital-age steering committee is a strategy to keep the administrators' and facultys' sight on evolving teaching & learning methods to that of a technology-powered, student-centered, approach. It is about much more than just introducing new technology into the school.